We searched MEDLINE, ECONLIT, and the internet with terms such as “medicolegal”, “liability”, “tort reform”, and “defensive medicine”. We also pursued articles referenced in primary sources and their relevant citations. Review articles and book chapters are cited to provide readers with more details and more references than this paper has room for. Our reference list was modified on the basis of comments from peer-reviewers.
ReviewEffects of the medical liability system in Australia, the UK, and the USA
Section snippets
Importance of the effects of tort law on medical care
The common law of torts awards damages to a patient when his or her doctor acts negligently and causes an injury. In a simple model of medical decision-making, this law would induce doctors and patients to balance the costs of liability against the costs of precaution and the health benefits of care.
Unfortunately, operation of the countries' health-care and liability systems deviates substantially from this simple model. Information and other barriers might prevent patients from filing a
Empirical estimates of the effect of tort law on medical care
This theoretical indeterminacy has resulted in vigorous debate about the effects of tort law on medical care. Early work investigated the effect of doctors' exposure to various measures of malpractice pressure on positive defensive medicine.20 Although most of this research reported evidence of defensive medicine, critics have argued that this result might be attributable to a fundamental limitation of its methods. In general, early researchers measured malpractice pressure by the frequency of
Four avenues for reform of tort compensation for medical injury
Policymakers and researchers in Australia, the UK, and the USA have experimented with different reforms to the traditional common law of tort to address shortcomings of the existing medical liability system. We discuss four of the most important.
Conclusion
How should common-law countries' tort systems apportion damages from medical injuries? Because the delivery of medical care is so different from the archetypal accident on which the law of torts is based, the law might lead doctors to take either too much or too little care to prevent medical injuries. In particular, because most patients and doctors in Australia, the UK, and the USA are insulated from the costs of precautionary tests and treatments, the liability system in these countries
Search strategy and selection criteria
References (63)
- et al.
Malpractice law and health care reform: optimal liability policy in an era of managed care
J Public Econ
(2002) - et al.
The impact of malpractice fears on cesarean section rates
J Health Econ
(1999) - et al.
How liability reform affects medical productivity
J Health Econ
(2002) - et al.
Medical malpractice liability and its effect on prenatal care utilization and infant health
J Health Econ
(2001) Inadequate justice when medical negligence is alleged
Lancet
(2003)Liability for medical malpractice
Medical negligence: an update. Briefing paper 2/2004 to the Parliament of NSW
Confronting the new health care crisis: improving health care quality and lowering costs by fixing our medical liability system
(2002)Trends in 2001 rates for physicians' medical professional liability insurance
(2001)US tort costs 2000: trends and findings on the costs of the US tort system
(2002)
Making amends: A consultation paper setting out proposals for reforming the approach to clinical negligence in the NHS
Medical malpractice insurance: multiple factors have contributed to increased premium rates, GAO-03-702 2003
Medical malpractice: implications of rising premiums on access to health care. GAO-03-836 2003
Economic and budget issue brief: limiting tort liability for medical malpractice
Review of the Law of Negligence Final Report (Ipp Report). Australian Health Ministers Advisory Council (AHMAC) Legal Process Reform Group. Responding to the medical indemnity crisis: an integrated reform package
Report to the Prime Minister. Affordable, secure, and fair
Liability insurance premium increases: causes and possible government responses
Better routes to redress
Evaluating policy alternatives for patient compensation. A report to the Department of Health
Patients, doctors, and lawyers: medical injury, malpractice litigation, and patient compensation in New York. A report of the Harvard Medical Practice Study to the state of New York
Negligent care and malpractice claiming behavior in Utah and Colorado
Med Care
Experience rating: does it make sense for medical malpractice insurance?
Am Econ Rev
Positive and negative factors in defensive medicine: a questionnaire study of general practitioners
BMJ
Defensive medicine among high-risk specialist physicians in a volatile malpractice environment
JAMA
Defensive medicine and medical malpractice. OTA-H-602
Do doctors practise defensive medicine?
Q J Econ
Liability, insurance, and defensive medicine: New evidence
The effects of malpractice pressure and liability reforms on physicians' perceptions of medical care
Law Contemporary Problems
Impact of malpractice reforms on the supply of physician services
JAMA
Cited by (111)
The short- and long-run effects of medical malpractice lawsuits on medical spending and hospital operations in China
2023, Journal of Comparative EconomicsCharacteristics of Medical Malpractice Claims Involving Temporomandibular Joint Surgery in the United States
2022, Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryEthically Alluring but Legally Destructive
2023, American Journal of Bioethics