Elsevier

The Lancet

Volume 373, Issue 9670, 4–10 April 2009, Pages 1183-1189
The Lancet

Articles
Moxifloxacin versus ethambutol in the initial treatment of tuberculosis: a double-blind, randomised, controlled phase II trial

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60333-0Get rights and content

Summary

Background

New treatments are needed to shorten the time required to cure tuberculosis and to treat drug-resistant strains. The fluoroquinolone moxifloxacin is a promising new agent that might have additive activity to existing antituberculosis agents. We assessed the activity and safety of moxifloxacin in the initial stage of tuberculosis treatment.

Methods

We undertook a phase II, double-blind, randomised controlled trial of a regimen that included moxifloxacin in adults with sputum smear-positive tuberculosis at one hospital in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. 170 participants received isoniazid, rifampicin, and pyrazinamide at standard doses and were assigned by permuted block randomisation to receive either moxifloxacin (400 mg) with an ethambutol placebo (n=85) or ethambutol (15–20 mg/kg) plus moxifloxacin placebo (n=85) 5 days per week for 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients whose sputum culture had converted to negative by week 8. Analysis was by modified intention to treat (ITT); patients whose baseline cultures were negative, contaminated, or contained drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis were excluded from the analysis. Additionally, all missing 8-week results were deemed treatment failures. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00082173.

Findings

74 patients assigned to the moxifloxacin group and 72 in the ethambutol group were included in the modified ITT population. 125 patients had 8-week data (moxifloxacin n=64, ethambutol n=61); the main reason for absence of data was culture contamination. At 8 weeks, culture conversion to negative had occurred in 59 (80%) of 74 patients in the moxifloxacin group compared with 45 (63%) of 72 in the ethambutol group (difference 17·2%, 95% CI 2·8–31·7; p=0·03). There were 16 adverse events (eight in each group) in 12 patients. Only one event was judged related to study drug (grade 3 cutaneous reaction in the ethambutol group).

Interpretation

Moxifloxacin improved culture conversion in the initial phase of tuberculosis treatment. Trials to assess whether moxifloxacin can be used to shorten the duration of tuberculosis treatment are justified.

Funding

US Food and Drug Administration Office of Orphan Product Development, with additional support from the US National Institutes of Health.

Introduction

The development of new drug regimens for tuberculosis is an urgent global health priority.1 Although so-called short-course treatment can effectively cure drug-susceptible tuberculosis in 6 months, a large proportion of patients in whom tuberculosis is diagnosed do not complete a course of treatment.2 New drugs that shorten the duration of tuberculosis treatment would substantially reduce the likelihood of disease recurrence and death caused by inadequate therapy. Additionally, since every year there are 500 000 reported cases of tuberculosis caused by strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis that are resistant to the key first-line drugs isoniazid and rifampicin, agents that are active in multidrug-resistant tuberculosis are also needed.3

Moxifloxacin is a fluoroquinolone that has potent in-vitro activity against M tuberculosis.4, 5 Early studies of moxifloxacin in murine models of tuberculosis showed that the drug had good bactericidal activity that was additive to isoniazid.6, 7 On the basis of these studies, we designed a phase II clinical trial to test the hypothesis that the substitution of ethambutol, an agent used primarily to prevent the emergence of drug resistance, with moxifloxacin would significantly increase the proportion of patients with negative sputum cultures after 8 weeks of treatment. 8-week sputum conversion has proved a useful surrogate marker of the sterilising activity of tuberculosis regimens,8 and a substantial improvement in this endpoint after moxifloxacin treatment would support progression to a phase III trial to assess whether a regimen including this drug could shorten the duration of tuberculosis treatment.

Section snippets

Patients

We undertook a single-centre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy trial of moxifloxacin versus ethambutol in patients with sputum smear-positive tuberculosis with no previous history of treatment in Hospital Clementino Fraga Filho, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Patients aged 18 years or older were eligible for enrolment if they had clinical signs and symptoms of pulmonary tuberculosis, including an abnormal chest radiograph and at least one sputum smear with acid-fast bacilli visible by

Results

From October, 2004, up to March, 2007, 197 patients were screened for participation in the trial. Figure 1 shows the trial profile. 74 patients assigned to the moxifloxacin group and 72 assigned to the ethambutol group were assessed for the primary outcome. In the modified ITT analysis, all missing data were deemed treatment failures.

Baseline characteristics of the patients are shown in table 1. A higher proportion of patients assigned to moxifloxacin had cavitation on chest radiograph than

Discussion

In this phase II clinical trial, we found that compared with ethambutol, moxifloxacin increased the proportion of sputum cultures that converted to negative in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. More patients in the moxifloxacin group were culture negative after 1 week of treatment than in the ethambutol group, and this difference continued through the 8 weeks of intensive-phase treatment. Compared with the control group, patients assigned to moxifloxacin had an absolute difference in

References (26)

  • A Jindani et al.

    Two 8-month regimens of chemotherapy for treatment of newly diagnosed pulmonary tuberculosis: international multicentre randomised trial

    Lancet

    (2004)
  • DB Young et al.

    Confronting the scientific obstacles to global control of tuberculosis

    J Clin Invest

    (2008)
  • C Dye et al.

    Low access to a highly effective therapy: a challenge for international tuberculosis control

    Bull World Health Organ

    (2002)
  • Global tuberculosis control 2008—surveillance, planning, financing

    (2008)
  • B Ji et al.

    In vitro and in vivo activities of moxifloxacin and clinafloxacin against Mycobacterium tuberculosis

    Antimicrob Agents Chemother

    (1998)
  • SH Gillespie et al.

    Activity of moxifloxacin against mycobacteria

    J Antimicrob Chemother

    (1999)
  • E Miyazaki et al.

    Moxifloxacin (BAY12-8039), a new 8-methoxyquinolone, is active in a mouse model of tuberculosis

    Antimicrob Agents Chemother

    (1999)
  • N Lounis et al.

    Effectiveness of once-weekly rifapentine and moxifloxacin regimens against Mycobacterium tuberculosis in mice

    Antimicrob Agents Chemother

    (2001)
  • DA Mitchison

    Assessment of new sterilizing drugs for treating pulmonary tuberculosis by culture at 2 months

    Am Rev Respir Dis

    (1993)
  • GP Kubica et al.

    Sputum digestion and decontamination with N-acetyl-L-cysteine-sodium hydroxide for culture of mycobacteria

    Am Rev Respir Dis

    (1963)
  • PT Kent et al.

    Public health mycobacteriology: a guide or the level III laboratory

    (1985)
  • W Fox et al.

    Studies on the treatment of tuberculosis undertaken by the British Medical Research Council tuberculosis units, 1946–1986, with relevant subsequent publications

    Int J Tuberc Lung Dis

    (1999)
  • Controlled clinical trial of short-course (6-month) regimens of chemotherapy for treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis

    Lancet

    (1972)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text