ORIGINAL ARTICLEA comparison of mid upper arm circumference, body mass index and weight loss as indices of undernutrition in acutely hospitalized patients
Introduction
Body mass index (BMI) and percentage weight loss are recommended and widely used to assess the nutrition of patients entering hospital. However it is not always possible to measure weight or height in the acutely ill because patients may not be able to stand or leave their bed. A nutritional supplementation trial (1) gave us the opportunity to assess the nutrition of 1561 patients on emergency admission to medical (1097), surgical (335) and orthopaedic (129) services of the Royal London Hospital, a teaching hospital in London's socially deprived East End. We sought to compare measurements of the mid upper arm circumference with the BMI and the percentage weight loss.
The purpose of such screening measures is to identify patients likely to benefit from enhanced nutritional care by improved outcome. They will thus be of most use in the acutely hospitalized patient if they can be shown to relate to outcome. Because the benefit of the nutritional interventions in the trial were small or non-existent, and the confidence intervals for difference in mean length of stay for supplements vs placebo were narrow, (−2 to 1.2 days) we used all the available data to assess the measurements’ validity as predictors for hospital length of stay and mortality.
Section snippets
Methods
Two research dietitians employed for the purposes of a nutritional supplementation trial (1), tried to include all consenting patients admitted as an emergency to General Medicine, Surgery or Orthopaedics on Sundays to Thursdays, from June 1997–January 1999. Patients admitted to the 15 relevant wards were identified by lists generated by the admissions department. Patients electively admitted to medical or orthopaedic wards were excluded. Patients were, whenever clinically possible, weighed and
The sample analysed
For the statistical analysis of 1561 study members 1559 had an outcome measure. Of these 1559, 78 had no MUAC, 867 had no BMI, and 11 had neither measurement. Those missing both were not considered in the analysis. In practice because of the clinical state of the patient weight and/or height could often not be measured. Thus MUAC measurements (Table 1) were obtained in 95% (848 m, 635f ) patients and BMI (Table 2) could be assessed in 44% (408 m, 285f). Weight loss data were successfully obtained
Discussion
Undernutrition in hospital patients is often unrecognized and there is a need for a simple means of screening to facilitate targeted nutritional intervention. BMI has been emphasized as an objective anthropometric criterion (4). The British Association for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (BAPEN) recommends that the measurements used for screening are based upon the patients weight for height (BMI) and their percentage weight loss (5). This study confirms the high prevalence of undernutrition
Acknowledgements
Ms Shona Vlaming, Ms Anzonette Biehler, Dr Crawford PJamieson, Dr Santanu Chattophadhyay, Ms Claire Archer, and Ms Katie Durman were all active investigators in the original study from which the data for this analysis are derived. Drs O.A. Obeid and Sandra Warrington and Ms A. Farrell also contributed to that study.
The study was supported by grants from the Responsive Funding Group of the North Thames Regional Health Authority NHS R&D and Abbott Laboratories Ltd. We thank the medical, surgical
References (10)
- Vlaming S, Biehler A, Hennessy E M et al. Should the food intake of patients admitted to acute hospital services be...
- Garrow J S, Webster J. Quetelet's index (W/H2 ) as a measure of fatness. Int J Obesity 1985; 9:...
- James W, Francois P J. The choice of cut-off point for distinguishing normal body weights from underweight or “chronic...
- James W P T, Ferro-Luzzi A, Waterlow JC. Definition of chronic energy deficiency in adults. Report of working party of...
- Sizer T (ed.). Standards and Guidelines for Nutritional Support of Patients in Hospitals. Maidenhead: BAPEN,...
Cited by (158)
Mid upper arm circumference as screening tool of overweight or obesity among adult employees of Mizan Tepi University, Southwest Ethiopia
2022, HeliyonCitation Excerpt :MUAC can be used if BMI can't be calculated due to inaccurate height measurement or if correct weight measurement is affected by fluid retention in the body [23]. Previous studies showed there is a positive correlation between MUAC and BMI [18, 24, 25, 26]. Previous cross-sectional studies conducted in India, Poland, Turkish, Dutch, South Africa, and Ethiopia among children and adolescents revealed that MUAC has an excellent screening ability for screening overweight or obesity among adolescents of both sexes [20, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32].
Nutritional assessment in patients treated for bronchopulmonary cancer: An update
2022, Medecine PalliativeDoes sarcopenia affect outcomes in pediatric surgical patients? A scoping review
2021, Journal of Pediatric SurgeryCan calf circumference be a viable option for nutritional assessment in the PICU?
2021, Clinical Nutrition ESPENNutritional predictors associated with malnutrition in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients
2021, Clinical Nutrition ESPENUse of mid-upper arm circumference to screen for thinness among sub-Saharan African male detainees
2021, Public Health Nutrition