Brief communication
Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Analysis of Food Impaction and Perforation in 251 Adolescent and Adult Patients

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2008.02.003Get rights and content

Background & Aims: Eosinophilic esophagitis is a rapidly emerging, chronic inflammatory disorder. Prolonged inflammation evokes structural alterations and a fragile esophageal wall prone to perforation/rupture and food impaction. This report assesses the risk of spontaneously arising and procedure-induced complications and proposes practical recommendations. Methods: The Swiss Esophageal Esophagitis Database documented 251 confirmed cases. A chart review identified which patients had required endoscopic bolus removal and/or experienced transmural esophageal perforation/rupture. In addition, a MEDLINE search for “eosinophilic esophagitis” with “esophageal perforation” or “esophageal rupture” was undertaken. Results: During an 18-year period, 87 patients (34.7%) experienced 134 food impactions requiring flexible (124, 92.5%) or rigid (10, 7.5%) endoscopic bolus removal. Transmural perforation occurred in 20% (2/10) of rigid procedures, and 1 esophageal rupture (Boerhaave's syndrome) was observed. Conclusions: Bolus removal by rigid endoscopy is a high-risk procedure and should be avoided in eosinophilic esophagitis patients who require a gentler approach. Whether food impaction and esophageal wall remodeling can be prevented with anti-inflammatory medication is still undetermined. All Boerhaave's syndrome cases should be evaluated for underlying eosinophilic esophagitis.

Section snippets

Methods

The Swiss EE Study Group consecutively enrolls patients presenting with a confirmed (by using clinical, endoscopic, and histologic methods) diagnosis into a Swiss EE Database, SEED, which was nationally established in 1989. Inclusion criteria are (1) PPI-resistant esophageal-related symptoms, (2) EE-consistent endoscopic abnormalities, (3) infiltration of the esophageal mucosa with at least 24 eosinophils/high-power field (HPF), and (4) informed consent.

We performed a chart review and included

Results and Case Presentation

The SEED documents a total of 251 confirmed EE cases in adults and adolescents. During this 18-year period, 87 patients (34.7%) experienced 1 or more (range, 1–5) persistent food impactions requiring endoscopic bolus removal. A total of 134 emergency endoscopies were undertaken to remove impacted food. Of these, 124 (92.5%) were performed with flexible gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy under sedation and 10 (7.5%) by rigid ENT endoscopy under general anesthesia. The selection of the procedure

Discussion and Conclusions

We report here on our 18-year experience with food impaction and esophageal perforation in 251 EE patients. In addition, we present 2 EE patients in whom the esophageal perforation was procedure-induced and 1 case in which rupture was associated with Boerhaave's syndrome. The management of persistent food impaction with the potentially fatal complication of an esophageal breach has several important clinical and legal consequences.

Food impaction is a common complication in EE patients.5 More

References (14)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (199)

  • Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Eosinophilic Esophagitis

    2024, Immunology and Allergy Clinics of North America
  • Clinical Evaluation of the Adult with Eosinophilic Esophagitis

    2024, Immunology and Allergy Clinics of North America
  • Esophageal dilation: the evolution of an art

    2021, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text