Survey of handheld computing among medical students
Section snippets
Introduction and background
Handheld computers, also known as PDAs or personal digital assistants, are growing in popularity among physicians [1], [2], [3]. The two main varieties of these devices are the Palm computer and the Pocket PC. Both are inexpensive, lightweight, and portable. They are small enough to fit into a shirt pocket. Through a direct connection or wireless network, they can integrate seamlessly with other computers.
While the adoption of handheld computers is on the rise, the breadth of clinical
Methods
We surveyed two groups of medical students. The preclinical group consisted of students who completed their preclinical training and were just starting their third-year clinical clerkships. The clinical group included students who were just completing their third-year clinical clerkships. Eligible participants at the George Washington University were students who attended a Practice of Medicine seminar, and were asked to fill out a paper-based version of the survey. Eligible participants from
Results
The participants provided information on usage patterns and user acceptance, which was normalized to create a utilization index (UI) and a satisfaction index (SI). These figures, shown as averages, percentages, or actual number counts, were analyzed for statistical significance using two-factor ANOVA and two-tailed paired t-tests. Linear relationships were analyzed using Pearson's correlation coefficients with two tails for the level of significance. In addition, a two-factor ANOVA was
Future expectations
The participants expressed an optimism for the future of handheld computing that was not reflected by the current utilizations of these devices. Handheld computers were used for personal activities and on a limited number of clinical applications. However, in the future, all participants strongly expected to use handheld computers for electronic medical records, patient tracking, clinical decision support, progress notes, lab results, and order entry.
This difference between the current role of
Conclusion
We presented a survey on the use and acceptance of handheld computing among medical students from the George Washington University and the University of Maryland. The students considered handheld computing an essential technology that was integral to their performance as future clinicians. There was however, a significant difference between the current role of handheld computers and future expectations. Those with more clinical experience were less satisfied with handheld computers, suggesting
Acknowledgement
The authors thank W. Scott Schroth and Venise Lewis at the George Washington University School of Medicine for their assistance.
References (16)
- et al.
A review and a framework of handheld computer adoption in healthcare
Int. J. Med. Inform.
(2005) - et al.
Survey assessment of personal digital assistant use among trainees and attending physicians
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.
(2003) Clinical applications of handheld computers
The wireless web and patient care
J. Med. Pract. Manage.
(2001)- et al.
Handheld computer use in US family practice residency programs
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.
(2002) - et al.
Pediatricians’ use of and attitudes about personal digital assistants
Pediatrics
(2004) - et al.
Handheld computer use in third year medical clerkships
PDA use among medical students and residents
Cited by (37)
A quantitative and qualitative assessment of the utilization of mobile computing devices by clinical pharmacists
2016, Health Policy and TechnologyCitation Excerpt :Five hundred and seventy-four pharmacists employed at a large multi-site health authority were sampled. An online survey tool was developed by the investigators based on the study objectives using questions derived from prior studies [5,7,13–16] and found via an extensive literature review. The survey tool was deployed in Fluid Surveys (www.fluidsurveys.com), piloted on a small cohort (n=5) of the target population and refined based on their feedback for ease of use and clarity.
Introducing a mobile learning model in medical education during COVID-19; a critical review
2022, Journal of Advances in Medical Education and ProfessionalismMobile learning in clinical settings: Unveiling the paradox
2021, Korean Journal of Medical Education