Left ventricular dysfunction and cardiac arrhythmias are frequent in type 2 myotonic dystrophy: A case control study
Introduction
Autosomal dominant neuromuscular disorders known as myotonic dystrophies are attributed to microsatellite repeat expansions [1], [2]. The nuclear accumulation of mutant RNA, which interferes with the splicing of multiple genes, may explain the involvement of multiple systems [3]. In most cases, the phenotype associates progressive myotonic myopathy, cataract, multiple endocrine organs dysfunction, respiratory insufficiency and heart disease [4].
DM1, or Steinert’s disease, and DM2, also called proximal myotonic myopathy, are two distinct types of myotonic dystrophies. Steinert’s disease is the most common (incidence 1/8000 population) neuromuscular disorder in adults, and is due to a CTG expansion in the DMPK gene [1]. DM2 is caused by a CCTG expansion in the ZNF9 gene [2]. Its 1/20,000 population incidence might be underestimated, since some patients have been misdiagnosed as suffering from DM1, or were simply unrecognized because of the subtle neuromuscular involvement and the complexity of the molecular genetic diagnosis.
The heart is involved in the majority of patients suffering from DM1, and a cardiac event is the primary cause of death in 20–29% of patients [5], [6]. In contrast, cardiac involvement is considered to be rare in DM2, but data regarding this population are sparse. A single study reported a series of 16 DM2 patients and did not support the possibility of major cardiac complications [7]. Conversely, several reports of isolated cases of conduction disturbances, pacemaker implantation and dilated cardiomyopathy have been reported [8], [9], [10], [11].
Hypothesizing that the severity of heart disease in DM2 may have been underestimated, we conducted this study to compare the prevalence of cardiac involvement in a large population of DM2 patients with matched DM1 patients and controls.
Section snippets
Study design
Patients with genetically proven DM2 who visited Pitié-Salpétriêre and Cochin Hospitals for routine evaluation from 2004 to December 2007 were included in our study. After providing informed consent, patients underwent neuromuscular, cardiac and respiratory investigations according to a predefined protocol. They were also screened for a history of heart disease among first or second degree relatives and only sudden death, heart failure due to non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy or pacemaker
Patient population (Tables 1 and 2)
Among 44 patients with genetically proven DM2, 1 declined to participate, and 5 patients were excluded because they presented specific cardiac disorders, including severe aortic stenosis associated with 3-vessel coronary artery disease in 1 patient, acute myocarditis in 1 patient and 2-vessel coronary disease in the 3 remaining patients. The results are therefore presented for 38 DM2 patients, 76 DM1 patients and 76 controls.
Southern blot quantification was not performed in 4 DM2 patients
Discussion
The main findings of our study are (1) a high prevalence of adverse cardiac events in patients presenting with DM2, when compared to controls, (2) an overall similar risk of cardiac involvement in DM2 and DM1 patients, with more frequent conductive disease in DM1 and a tendency to more frequent atrial fibrillation and left ventricular dysfunction in DM2 patients, and (3) an association between conduction system and depressed LVEF in DM2.
The strengths of our study are (1) the large population of
Limitations of the study
Despite being the largest study of patients suffering from DM2 reported thus far, the size of our patient population precluded detailed analyses of various subgroups. In our study, we report a high prevalence of overt cardiac involvement in DM2 patients. Our results are based on a strategy of systematic cardiac investigations that was planned previously. Although we assume that our strategy, while allowing earlier diagnosis and therapeutic, may favorably impact the prognostic of DM2 patients,
Funding sources
This study was supported by grants from the Association Française contre les Myopathies (AFM).
Acknowledgement
The authors do thank Professor Christian Spaulding for his assistance in the redaction of this manuscript.
References (14)
- et al.
Molecular basis of myotonic dystrophy: expansion of a trinucleotide (CTG) repeat at the 3 end of a transcript encoding a protein kinase family member
Cell
(1992) - et al.
Proximal myotonic myopathy: a syndrome with a favourable prognosis?
J Neurol Sci
(2002) - et al.
Left ventricular non-compaction in a patient with myotonic dystrophy type 2
Neuromuscul Disord.
(2008) - et al.
Myotonic dystrophy type 2 caused by a CCTG expansion in intron 1 of ZNF9
Science
(2001) - et al.
Foci of trinucleotide repeat transcripts in nuclei of myotonic dystrophy cells and tissues
J Cell Biol
(1995) - et al.
Myotonic dystrophy type 2: molecular, diagnostic and clinical spectrum
Neurology
(2003) - et al.
A 10-year study of mortality in a cohort of patients with myotonic dystrophy
Neurology
(1999)
Cited by (60)
Systemic Diseases and Heart Block
2023, Cardiology ClinicsSystemic Diseases and Heart Block
2021, Cardiac Electrophysiology ClinicsCardiac Complications of Neuromuscular Disorders
2021, Neuromuscular Disorders: Treatment and ManagementCardiovascular manifestations of myotonic dystrophy
2020, Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine