Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

Treating prostate cancer with radiotherapy

Abstract

This Review focuses on the adverse effects of radical radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. The adverse effects are described in the context of alternative treatment modalities. First, we consider the methodological issues that make comparison between the different treatment modalities problematic. Such issues include differences in baseline levels of urinary, bowel and sexual dysfunction, the importance of using patient-reported outcomes and the distinction between actuarial and prevalence rates of treatment-related toxic effects. Second, we describe the pattern of adverse effects that occur over time after radiotherapy. Here, we focus on evidence for a beneficial effect of radiotherapy on some urinary symptoms, and the controversy regarding the risk of secondary malignancy. Third, predictors of radiation toxicity are discussed. Accurate prediction of radiotherapy toxicity would be an invaluable tool for treatment individualization. It is noteworthy that the data on the adverse effects of prostate radiotherapy necessarily relate to treatment as it was delivered in the past. It is likely that recent technical advances, such as intensity modulation and image guidance, will further improve the toxicity profile of prostate radiotherapy.

Key Points

  • Studies of treatment-related toxic effects should include analysis of pretreatment functional status, patient-reported outcomes and the use of prevalence, rather than cumulative, rates of toxicity

  • Data from the SPCG7 trial show that the addition of prostate radiotherapy has only a modest impact on mean urinary, bowel and sexual bother in men receiving hormone treatment

  • Pretreatment bowel function and prior abdomino-pelvic surgery are important predictors of late rectal toxicity after prostate radiotherapy

  • Obstructive lower urinary tract symptoms typically improve after prostate radiotherapy

  • Any additional risk of rectal cancer after prostate radiotherapy remains uncertain

  • Intensity modulated radiotherapy and image-guided radiotherapy have the potential to further improve the therapeutic index of prostate radiotherapy

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Changes in reported symptoms in urinary, bowel, sexual and global health domains.7
Figure 2: Smoothed probability plots of the interval likelihood of returning to baseline health-related quality of life as measured by various instruments.
Figure 3: IMRT plans for prostate cancer treatment.
Figure 4: Antero-posterior and lateral electronic portal imaging device (EPID) and digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRR) showing gold fiducial markers within the prostate gland.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stephenson, A. J. et al. Prostate cancer-specific mortality after radical prostatectomy for patients treated in the prostate-specific antigen era. J. Clin. Oncol. 27, 4300–4305 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Brandeis, J. M. et al. Quality of life outcomes after brachytherapy for early stage prostate cancer. J. Urol. 163, 851–857 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Arterbery, V. E. et al. Quality of life after permanent prostate implant. Semin. Surg. Oncol. 13, 461–464 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sanda, M. G. et al. Quality of life and satisfaction with outcome among prostate-cancer survivors. N. Engl. J. Med. 358, 1250–1261 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Litwin, M. S., Lubeck, D. P., Henning, J. M. & Carroll, P. R. Differences in urologist and patient assessments of health related quality of life in men with prostate cancer: results of the CaPSURE database. J. Urol. 159, 1988–1992 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Christie, D. et al. Delayed rectal and urinary symptomatology in patients treated for prostate cancer by radiotherapy with or without short term neo-adjuvant androgen deprivation. Radiother. Oncol. 77, 117–125 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lancar, R., Kramar, A. & Haie-Meder, C. Non-parametric methods for analysing recurrent complications of varying severity. Stat. Med. 14, 2701–2712 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Widmark, A. et al. Endocrine treatment, with or without radiotherapy, in locally advanced prostate cancer (SPCG-7/SFUO-3): an open randomised phase III trial. Lancet 373, 301–308 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fransson, P. et al. Quality of life in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer given endocrine treatment with or without radiotherapy: 4-year follow-up of SPCG-7/SFUO-3, an open-label, randomised, phase III trial. Lancet Oncol. 10, 370–380 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Osoba, D., Rodrigues, G., Myles, J., Zee, B. & Pater, J. Interpreting the significance of changes in health-related quality-of-life scores. J. Clin. Oncol. 16, 139–144 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Theobald, D. E. Cancer pain, fatigue, distress, and insomnia in cancer patients. Clin. Cornerstone 6 (Suppl. 1D), S15–S21 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pirl, W. F., Greer, J. A., Goode, M. & Smith, M. R. Prospective study of depression and fatigue in men with advanced prostate cancer receiving hormone therapy. Psychooncology 17, 148–153 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Dearnaley, D. P. et al. The early toxicity of escalated versus standard dose conformal radiotherapy with neo-adjuvant androgen suppression for patients with localised prostate cancer: results from the MRC RT01 trial (ISRCTN47772397). Radiother. Oncol. 83, 31–41 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kleinerman, R. A. et al. Second primary cancer after treatment for cervical cancer. An international cancer registries study. Cancer 76, 442–452 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Travis, L. B. et al. Second malignant neoplasms among long-term survivors of ovarian cancer. Cancer Res. 56, 1564–1570 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Travis, L. B. et al. Risk of second malignant neoplasms among long-term survivors of testicular cancer. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 89, 1429–1439 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Dores, G. M. et al. Second malignant neoplasms among long-term survivors of Hodgkin's disease: a population-based evaluation over 25 years. J. Clin. Oncol. 20, 3484–3494 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Brenner, D. J., Curtis, R. E., Hall, E. J. & Ron, E. Second malignancies in prostate carcinoma patients after radiotherapy compared with surgery. Cancer 88, 398–406 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Neugut, A. I., Ahsan, H., Robinson, E. & Ennis, R. D. Bladder carcinoma and other second malignancies after radiotherapy for prostate carcinoma. Cancer 79, 1600–1604 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bhojani, N. et al. The rate of secondary malignancies after radical prostatectomy versus external beam radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: a population-based study on 17,845 patients. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 76, 342–348 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Baxter, N. N., Tepper, J. E., Durham, S. B., Rothenberger, D. A. & Virnig, B. A. Increased risk of rectal cancer after prostate radiation: a population-based study. Gastroenterology 128, 819–824 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kendal, W. S., Eapen, L., Macrae, R., Malone, S. & Nicholas, G. Prostatic irradiation is not associated with any measurable increase in the risk of subsequent rectal cancer. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 65, 661–668 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Andreyev, J. Gastrointestinal symptoms after pelvic radiotherapy: a new understanding to improve management of symptomatic patients. Lancet Oncol. 8, 1007–1017 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Fellin, G. et al. Clinical and dosimetric predictors of late rectal toxicity after conformal radiation for localized prostate cancer: results of a large multicenter observational study. Radiother. Oncol. 93, 197–202 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. van Tol-Geerdink, J. J. et al. Do patients with localized prostate cancer treatment really want more aggressive treatment? J. Clin. Oncol. 24, 4581–4586 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Gore, J. L., Kwan, L., Lee, S. P., Reiter, R. E. & Litwin, M. S. Survivorship beyond convalescence: 48-month quality-of-life outcomes after treatment for localized prostate cancer. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 101, 888–892 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Vora, S. A., Wong, W. W., Schild, S. E., Ezzell, G. A. & Halyard, M. Y. Analysis of biochemical control and prognostic factors in patients treated with either low-dose three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy or high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 68, 1053–1058 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Zelefsky, M. J. et al. High dose radiation delivered by intensity modulated conformal radiotherapy improves the outcome of localized prostate cancer. J. Urol. 166, 876–881 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Al-Mamgani, A., Heemsbergen, W. D., Peeters, S. T. & Lebesque, J. V. Role of intensity-modulated radiotherapy in reducing toxicity in dose escalation for localized prostate cancer. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 73, 685–691 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Chung, H. T., Xia, P., Chan, L. W., Park-Somers, E. & Roach, M. 3rd. Does image-guided radiotherapy improve toxicity profile in whole pelvic-treated high-risk prostate cancer? Comparison between IG-IMRT and IMRT. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 73, 53–60 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hall, E. J. & Wuu, C. S. Radiation-induced second cancers: the impact of 3D-CRT and IMRT. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 56, 83–88 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Hall, E. J. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy, protons, and the risk of second cancers. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 65, 1–7 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ploquin, N. & Dunscombe, P. A cost–outcome analysis of Image-Guided Patient Repositioning in the radiation treatment of cancer of the prostate. Radiother. Oncol. 93, 25–31 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Konski, A. et al. Using decision analysis to determine the cost-effectiveness of intensity-modulated radiation therapy in the treatment of intermediate risk prostate cancer. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 66, 408–415 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

A. Wilkins contributed to the data research, writing, and reviewing/editing of the manuscript. C. Parker contributed to the data research, discussion, and reviewing/editing of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Wilkins.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wilkins, A., Parker, C. Treating prostate cancer with radiotherapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 7, 583–589 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2010.135

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2010.135

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing