Are hygiene standards useful in assessing infection risk?

Am J Infect Control. 2008 Jun;36(5):381-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2007.10.015.

Abstract

Background: We monitored the surface level cleanliness in a 5-bed surgical intensive care unit (SICU) over a 10-week period to evaluate proposed hygiene standards.

Methods: Ten environmental sites within the SICU were sampled twice weekly, along with collection of clinical and patient activity data. The standards designate aerobic colony counts (ACCs) > 2.5 colony-forming units/cm(2) from hand-touch sites and the presence of Staphylococcus aureus as indicating hygiene failure.

Results: Nearly 25% of the 200 samples analyzed did not meet the standards, mostly from hand-touch sites on curtains, beds, and medical equipment. The total number of failures each week was associated with bed occupancy (P = .04), with a trend toward association with SICU-acquired infection (P = .11). Environmental S aureus was associated with the proportion of beds occupied (P = .02). Indistinguishable genotypes were found between patient and environmental staphylococci, with time scales supporting staphylococcal transmission in both directions.

Conclusions: Hygiene standards based on microbial growth levels and the presence of S aureus reflect patient activity and provide a means to risk-manage infection. They also expose a staphylococcal reservoir that could represent a more tangible risk to patients. Standards for surface level cleanliness merit further evaluation.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Cross Infection / prevention & control*
  • Environmental Monitoring
  • Humans
  • Hygiene / standards*
  • Infection Control / methods*
  • Intensive Care Units
  • Risk Assessment / methods
  • Risk Factors
  • Staphylococcal Infections / microbiology
  • Staphylococcal Infections / prevention & control*
  • Staphylococcus aureus / drug effects
  • Staphylococcus aureus / isolation & purification