Medical compared with surgical treatment for massive pulmonary embolism

Lancet. 1994 Mar 5;343(8897):576-7. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)91523-7.

Abstract

We compared embolectomy (when available) with thrombolysis in patients with shock and massive pulmonary embolism. 13 patients were operated on, 10 (77%) of whom survived. The inferior vena cava was routinely clipped. The 24 medically treated patients were given alteplase until systemic and pulmonary artery pressures stabilised and heparin thereafter; 16 (67%) survived. Major haemorrhage occurred in 28% of medically treated patients, but was not fatal. 1 patient had a small cerebral haemorrhage that resolved without drainage. One-fifth of the medical group had a re-embolism, which suggests that temporary caval umbrellas are indicated in medically treated patients. Thrombolysis may provide a life-saving option and a randomised trial is warranted.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Controlled Clinical Trial

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Drug Therapy, Combination
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Hemorrhage / chemically induced
  • Heparin / adverse effects
  • Heparin / therapeutic use*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Pulmonary Artery / surgery
  • Pulmonary Embolism / drug therapy*
  • Pulmonary Embolism / mortality
  • Pulmonary Embolism / surgery*
  • Survival Rate
  • Thrombolytic Therapy* / adverse effects
  • Tissue Plasminogen Activator / adverse effects
  • Tissue Plasminogen Activator / therapeutic use*
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Vena Cava, Inferior / surgery

Substances

  • Heparin
  • Tissue Plasminogen Activator