A simple measure to improve sepsis documentation and coding

Clin Med (Lond). 2021 May;21(3):222-225. doi: 10.7861/clinmed.2020-0868.

Abstract

Introduction: Sepsis incidence and mortality are increasing, yet sepsis appears to be under-recognised and under-reported. Accurate recognition and coding of sepsis allows for appropriate funding and accurate epidemiological representation.

Methods: We implemented a discharge summary template for all patients discharged from our infectious diseases service and analysed sepsis documentation and coding before and after its introduction.

Results: Beforehand, we found that 59% of 29 patients had sepsis, yet only 10% had it documented on their discharge summary, and 17% had it coded. Following implementation of the template, 38% of 52 patients had sepsis documented, yet only 20% of these had it coded. After delivery of a training session to the coders regarding the importance of sepsis, 38% of patients with a diagnosis of sepsis had it coded.

Discussion: Despite requiring ongoing education and encouragement of clinicians and coders, implementation of the template was quick, cheap and easy and improved sepsis coding.

Keywords: coding; funding; infection; quality improvement; sepsis.

MeSH terms

  • Clinical Coding*
  • Documentation
  • Humans
  • Incidence
  • Patient Discharge
  • Sepsis* / diagnosis
  • Sepsis* / therapy