Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Filters

My NCBI Filters

Results by year

Table representation of search results timeline featuring number of search results per year.

Year Number of Results
2010 2
2011 2
2012 3
2013 6
2014 4
2015 14
2016 13
2017 9
2018 18
2019 21
2020 18
2021 8
2022 1
2023 2
2024 0

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Publication date

Similar articles for PMID: 33762365

98 results

Results by year

Filters applied: . Clear all
Page 1
Computed tomography myocardial perfusion vs 15O-water positron emission tomography and fractional flow reserve.
Williams MC, Mirsadraee S, Dweck MR, Weir NW, Fletcher A, Lucatelli C, MacGillivray T, Golay SK, Cruden NL, Henriksen PA, Uren N, McKillop G, Lima JA, Reid JH, van Beek EJ, Patel D, Newby DE. Williams MC, et al. Eur Radiol. 2017 Mar;27(3):1114-1124. doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4404-5. Epub 2016 Jun 22. Eur Radiol. 2017. PMID: 27334015 Free PMC article.
Downstream testing after CT coronary angiography: time for a rethink?
Morgan-Hughes G, Williams MC, Loudon M, Roobottom CA, Veitch A, Van Lingen R, Holloway B, Bellenger N, Schmitt M, Bull R. Morgan-Hughes G, et al. Open Heart. 2021 Feb;8(1):e001597. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2021-001597. Open Heart. 2021. PMID: 33622963 Free PMC article.
Clinical outcomes of fractional flow reserve by computed tomographic angiography-guided diagnostic strategies vs. usual care in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: the prospective longitudinal trial of FFR(CT): outcome and resource impacts study.
Douglas PS, Pontone G, Hlatky MA, Patel MR, Norgaard BL, Byrne RA, Curzen N, Purcell I, Gutberlet M, Rioufol G, Hink U, Schuchlenz HW, Feuchtner G, Gilard M, Andreini D, Jensen JM, Hadamitzky M, Chiswell K, Cyr D, Wilk A, Wang F, Rogers C, De Bruyne B; PLATFORM Investigators. Douglas PS, et al. Eur Heart J. 2015 Dec 14;36(47):3359-67. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv444. Epub 2015 Sep 1. Eur Heart J. 2015. PMID: 26330417 Free PMC article.
Impact of machine learning-based coronary computed tomography angiography fractional flow reserve on treatment decisions and clinical outcomes in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.
Qiao HY, Tang CX, Schoepf UJ, Tesche C, Bayer RR 2nd, Giovagnoli DA, Todd Hudson H Jr, Zhou CS, Yan J, Lu MJ, Zhou F, Lu GM, Jiang JW, Zhang LJ. Qiao HY, et al. Eur Radiol. 2020 Nov;30(11):5841-5851. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-06964-w. Epub 2020 May 28. Eur Radiol. 2020. PMID: 32462444
Hemodynamic impact of coronary stenosis using computed tomography: comparison between noninvasive fractional flow reserve and 3D fusion of coronary angiography with stress myocardial perfusion.
Patel AR, Maffessanti F, Patel MB, Kebed K, Narang A, Singh A, Medvedofsky D, Zaidi SJ, Mediratta A, Goyal N, Kachenoura N, Lang RM, Mor-Avi V. Patel AR, et al. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Sep;35(9):1733-1743. doi: 10.1007/s10554-019-01618-5. Epub 2019 May 9. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019. PMID: 31073698 Free PMC article.
98 results