Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Clinical Medicine Journal

  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Clinical Medicine Journal

clinmedicine Logo
  • ClinMed Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About ClinMed
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

The end of compulsory retirement?

CD Karabus
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.9-4-398
Clin Med August 2009
CD Karabus
Consultant Paediatrician and former GMC member, Cape Town
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Editor – I was interested to read the latest Conversations with Charles (Clin Med 2009 pp 199–200). Three years ago I applied for a locum paediatric post in Edinburgh and was turned down because of my age of 71. As a member of the General Medical Council (GMC), I complained of age discrimination to them to be told they ‘had no remit over the policy of the NHS including how it meets its obligations under equality legislation’. This occurred despite the fact that the GMC had twice trumpeted its opposition to discrimination on grounds of age and other criteria in its GMC Today (June 2006) and again with the announcement of its GMC Equality Scheme (GMC Today March 2007).

Neither of my letters to GMC Today asking whether their statements meant anything or were merely the mouthing of platitudes were published – though the editor did thank me for writing!

While I agree with Charles that performance may decline with age in the individual, I do not understand why opinions of one's competence by colleagues (including two in the UK) who worked with me are not more important than mere chronologic age. Otherwise, what is the point of having referees? Need one add good qualifications of a paediatrician in current practice, proof of many continuing professional development points, regular attendances at congresses and refresher courses and robust health?

I must presumably accept the GMC's meek statement that they cannot do anything when the NHS (probably the major employer of their members) practises age discrimination. However, why then does the GMC hypocritically publicise its so-called opposition to discrimination?

The end of compulsory retirement?

The letter was shown to Charles, who is grateful for Dr Karabus's interest and is in full agreement with him, saying ‘I must confess I am not surprised. The GMC is not unique among public bodies in being inconsistent in its approach to different constituencies. It may have felt it was improper to plead on behalf of an individual. Nevertheless it is ironic that this occurred at a time when the GMC precipitately pursued an unintended consequence of the same legislation to the disadvantage of many individuals in discontinuing the fee waiver for those over 65. It could have held that in view of the serious implications for many semi-retired doctors and their clients, and the impending changes in the fee structure, the earliest practicable way to comply with the law was to await the introduction of licensing and make all the changes at the same time. By chance last month's conversation raised a similar issue where there is a conflict between the ethical advice not to allow financial gain to influence clinical decisions and inducement payments by the NHS to general practitioners. While the GMC is very willing to give strict advice to individual doctors it seems less willing to help them to carry this out by raising the issue with their commissioners and the government. If the GMC really abhors age discrimination and improper financial considerations, I believe it should not be afraid of causing upset, but be more forthcoming in letting its views be known to those who might be involved’.

  • © 2009 Royal College of Physicians

Footnotes

  • Please submit letters for the Editor's consideration within three weeks of receipt of the Journal. Letters should ideally be limited to 350 words, and sent by email to: Clinicalmedicine{at}rcplondon.ac.uk

  • © 2009 Royal College of Physicians
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
The end of compulsory retirement?
CD Karabus
Clinical Medicine Aug 2009, 9 (4) 398; DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.9-4-398

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The end of compulsory retirement?
CD Karabus
Clinical Medicine Aug 2009, 9 (4) 398; DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.9-4-398
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • JAK-inhibition as a therapeutic strategy for refractory primary systemic vasculitides
  • Response
  • Functional disorders and chronic pain
Show more Letters to the editor

Similar Articles

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home
clinmedicine Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2021 by the Royal College of Physicians