Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us

Future Healthcare Journal

  • FHJ Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About FHJ
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
RCP Journals
Home
  • Log in
  • Home
  • Our journals
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Future Healthcare Journal
  • Subject collections
  • About the RCP
  • Contact us
Advanced

Future Healthcare Journal

futurehosp Logo
  • FHJ Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Author guidance
    • Instructions for authors
    • Submit online
  • About FHJ
    • Scope
    • Editorial board
    • Policies
    • Information for reviewers
    • Advertising

Multiple medical admissions – an opportunity for improved care?

Mark Whitsey
Download PDF
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7861/futurehosp.6-1-s116
Future Healthc J March 2019
Mark Whitsey
Elderly Care Department, New Cross Hospital, Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
Loading

Aims

This study aimed to provide an accurate description of patients with multiple medical admission (≥3 non-elective admissions (NEA) in preceding 12 months) within an NHS hospital, a description of current care and a judgement on predicted care needs for good holistic care by expert assessors.

Methods

This was a prospective study which assessed a population who were on their third or greater NEA to a medicine within an urban district general hospital. The study was a 1 day, real time assessment of current clinical course, health provision, needs and decision making, with 90 day follow-up. Patients were identified through a novel clinical information technology system which joined up patient activity, using NHS numbers between primary, secondary and community care. Assessors number general practitioners with total greater than 60 years consultant experience. Assessors went through a process of orientation and utilised template data collection documents for process standardisation. Data was split into two sections: factual information available from documented notes and judgement information based on the available information. Data were analysed using SPSS v24.

Results

Point prevalence of patients with multiple NEAs for this NHS district general hospital was 21%. Of this 56 were studied. At assessment, average length of stay was 13 days. On follow up total average length of stay was 28 days totalling 1,584 bed days.

Characteristics

The population was elderly (mean age 78), multimorbid (mean of four long-term conditions (LTC)), frail (76% with clinical frailty score ≥3), immobile (74% some level of immobility) and dependent (66% some level of community support). Eighty-one per cent were admitted from their own home and not a long-term care setting. The leading cause of admission was infection (41%). Forty per cent of admissions were related to a LTC with malignancy, and respiratory disorders were the most common. At the point of admission, 93% of admissions were justified but 22% of admissions were considered by assessors to have been avoidable.

Care needs

Processes felt to be important to good holistic care were very incomplete in all domains at the point of assessment and subsequently at discharge. Assessors judged a very high need for attainment in all domains (Table 1). Fifteen per cent of patients had had a documented assessment of life expectancy while assessors judged that 83% of patients were in the last year of life and that 19% were in the last 3 months. Assessors judged that readmission within 30 days was either ‘highly likely’ or ‘probable’ in 31%.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Need for attainment in all domains

90-day follow-up

Total mortality of the initial study sample was 43%. Forty-six per cent of patients survived to discharge. Thirteen died (28%) in the 90 days post discharge. At 90 days, there had been 25 patients who had been readmitted (54%) one or more times. Assessors’ judgements on needs for good holistic care were analysed against mortality and readmission. Against mortality these showed statistical significance for life expectancy judgements (>1 year, p=0.02; <3 months, p=0.005) and requirement for an advance care plan (p=0.001). Negative predictive values were strong for all. Against readmission these showed statistical significance for clinical stability (p=0.02) and those felt likely to be at risk of imminent unplanned readmission (p=0.009).

Conclusion

Patients who have had ≥3 NEA within the previous year are old, frail and multimorbid. Whilst their acute issues need to be addressed, experienced physician assessment was that there can be improvements in additional care factors that are pertinent to good holistic care. These are valid relative to this cohort’s high mortality and readmissions rates. General physicians were able to accurately determine who would not need this input. Using the simple metric of ≥3 NEA in preceding year may allow focus of resource on this needful cohort.

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

  • © Royal College of Physicians 2019. All rights reserved.
Back to top
Previous articleNext article

Article Tools

Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Multiple medical admissions – an opportunity for improved care?
Mark Whitsey
Future Healthc J Mar 2019, 6 (Suppl 1) 116-117; DOI: 10.7861/futurehosp.6-1-s116

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Multiple medical admissions – an opportunity for improved care?
Mark Whitsey
Future Healthc J Mar 2019, 6 (Suppl 1) 116-117; DOI: 10.7861/futurehosp.6-1-s116
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Aims
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Conclusion
    • Conflict of interest statement
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Inaccessible back: frustration and misery of lonely patients
  • Methylation of somatostatin receptor 2 gene in neuroendocrine tumours as a predictor of tumour response to peptide receptor radionuclide therapy
  • Viral and other infections in community and primary hypothyroidism – cause or coincidence?
Show more Research and innovation

Similar Articles

Navigate this Journal

  • Journal Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive

Related Links

  • ClinMed - Home
  • FHJ - Home

Other Services

  • Advertising
futurehosp Footer Logo
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
HighWire Press, Inc.

Follow Us:

  • Follow HighWire Origins on Twitter
  • Visit HighWire Origins on Facebook

Copyright © 2021 by the Royal College of Physicians